Martin Damm vs Tyler Zink Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Damm vs T. Zink

Martin Damm
USA
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
22
Age
24
-
Height
-
175
C. Rank
293
173
Best Rank
278
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$262.0K
Career Money
$4.9K
-
Plays
-

Tyler Zink
USA
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
22
Age
24
-
Height
-
175
C. Rank
293
173
Best Rank
278
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$262.0K
Career Money
$4.9K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Damm 2 - 0 Zink
They have played 4 sets in total, with Martin Damm winning 4 and Tyler Zink winning 0. The last match between Martin Damm and Tyler Zink was at the M15 Champaign, 16-09-2021, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Martin Damm getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Damm | 2 |
| Zink | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Champaign(09-16-21)
Martin Damm
7
6
Tyler Zink
6
4
(R2) M15 Fayetteville(11-05-20)
Martin Damm
6
6
Tyler Zink
3
1
M. Damm vs T. Zink H2H Profile
M. Damm vs T. Zink Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martin Damm has won 49.85% of points on their second serve, while Tyler Zink has won 44.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martin Damm, in recent form, has won 43.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tyler Zink has won 43.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 20.43% and 25.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martin Damm has saved 59.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tyler Zink has saved 56.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martin Damm has won 72.22% of matches played (W/L 52/20), with Tyler Zink winning 54.41% (W/L 37/31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martin Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 100/56), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 42/43). Tyler Zink has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 31/23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Martin Damm has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/12), where as Tyler Zink has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 18/21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Martin Damm winning 2 times and Tyler Zink being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Martin Damm winning 4 and Tyler Zink winning 0.
- The last match between Martin Damm and Tyler Zink was at the M15 Champaign, 16-09-2021, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Martin Damm getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martin Damm has played against opponents with an average rank of 380.89 while Tyler Zink has played against players with an average rank of 328.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martin Damm has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tyler Zink has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martin Damm has converted 25.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tyler Zink has converted 31.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Martin Damm vs Tyler Zink Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Damm vs T. Zink H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 14 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:33:30 | Average Match Time | 1:33:30 |
| 63% (73/116) | 1st Serve % | 56% (79/140) |
| 85% (62/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (53/79) |
| 56% (24/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (24/61) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 45% (63/140) | Return Points Win % | 26% (30/116) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Damm 52%, Zink 49%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Damm 48%, Zink 49%.
Break Points Saved %: Damm 68%, Zink 61%.
M. Damm Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | L | 6-3 7-6(2) | ||
SF | W | 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
T. Zink Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||

M. Damm vs T. Zink Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.12% (188/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.30% (101/85) |
| 57.93% (431/313) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.26% (220/201) |
| 52.50% (3943/3568) | Games Win/Loss | 50.90% (2066/1993) |
| 64.10% (100/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.08% (50/46) |
| 49.41% (42/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.41% (31/23) |
| 59.74% (46/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.88% (19/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.84 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 3069 | Aces Total | 826 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1222 | Total Double Faults | 380 |
| 1:41:53 | Average Match Time | 1:34:29 |
| 432.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 412.59 |
| 59% (13421/22581) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6946/11839) |
| 76% (10241/13421) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4897/6946) |
| 50% (4576/9160) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2442/4893) |
| 39% (712/1826) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (426/1109) |
| 36% (7955/22241) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4374/11514) |
| 50.00% (5/5) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 52.03% (64/59) | Challenger W/L | 44.00% (22/28) |
| 65.91% (116/60) | Futures W/L | 59.09% (78/54) |
| 59% (182/309) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (100/185) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (88/163) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (26/54) |
| 47% (52/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 80% (201/161) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (102/89) |
| 20% (201/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (102/13) |
| 21% (117/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (84/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:05 AM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
01:05
H2H 0-0
01:05
H2H 0-0
01:45
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece